摘要 科斯提出缺乏思想市场是中国经济社会发展的瓶颈,没有活跃、自由的思想市场,“解放思想”亦不能成功。结合改革开放的实际,本文认为:其一,经由解放思想而形成的“内部思想市场”支撑了中国改革开放以来的经济社会奇迹;其二,科斯关于中国的思想市场与“解放思想”之间关系的论断,有倒果为因之嫌;其三,中国经济社会发展的瓶颈可能与“内部思想市场”的特点有关。对待“解放思想”的态度变化,造成思想市场的波动,这可能也是中国经济社会总体保持前行,但又时有曲折的原因之一。 Ronald H.Coase has pointed out that the absence of the market for ideas is the bottleneck of China's economic and social development.The“emancipation of the mind”cannot succeed without an active and free market for ideas.based on the realities of the“reform and opening-up”,this paper holds the following opinions.First,the internal market for ideas formed by the“emancipation of the mind”has supported the economic and social miracle of China since the“reform and opening-up”.Second,Coase's assertion about the relationship between China's market for ideas and“emancipation of the mind”may have inverted the causality.Third,the bottleneck of China's economic and social development may be related to the characteristics of the internal market for ideas.The change in attitude towards“emancipation of the mind”has caused fluctuations in the market for ideas,which may also be one of the reasons why China's economy and society have generally kept moving forward but sometimes suffered from twists and turns.
机构地区 山东农业大学公共管理学院 南京大学社会学院
出处 《中国研究》 2020年第2期29-42,268,共15页 China Studies
关键词 “中国奇迹” 思想市场 解放思想 内部思想市场 “China Miracle” the market for ideas emancipation of the mind the internal market for ideas
分类号 F12 [经济管理—世界经济]
