摘要 学界多认为,顾颉刚将传统古史中的帝王故事还原为神话传说后,没有或较少去追溯这些神话传说的来源;他对古史"层累"造成的分析,也多是着眼于东周秦汉间"时势"推演的历时性或线性分析。不过,这主要是顾颉刚早期著述中的特点。到20世纪30年代,他已经开始追溯传统古史学说的来源,后来更提出"整整齐齐的一大套中国古史"多源于西方羌戎宗教故事的说法。与此同时,他对传统古史源流演变的分析,也不再仅是着眼于宏大"时势"的历时性或线性分析,而是更多地体现出"故事跨地域流布"视角,即故事在跨地域流布过程中,会被多元地域文化层层附着,出现共时性多元文化向历时性一元叙事的转化。这样,顾颉刚在其古史考辨中,不仅追溯了古史传说的源头,其方法路径也得到了进一步完善。 Academia mostly believed that after Gu Jiegang reverted the stories about emperors in traditional ancient history to myths and legends,he did not or rarely traced their origins.His analysis on ancient history by"accumulation"mainly focused on the diachronic and linear analysis about the inference of"the trends of the time"during the period of Dongzhou,and the Qing and Han dynasties.However,this was mainly the feature of Gu Jiegang’s early writings.By the1930 s,he had begun to trace the origins of the arguments about traditional ancient history,and later,he proposed that"a complete series of ancient Chinese history"mainly came from the religious stories of Qiang Rong in the West of China.Concurrently,his analysis on the evolution of traditional ancient historical origins did not concentrate on the diachronic and linear analysis of the grand"trends of the time",but displayed a perspective of"cross-regional distribution of stories",that is,stories would be attached to multiple regional cultures in their spread across various regions.As such,the narratives of multiple diachronic cultures were transformed into that of a synchronic culture.In this way,Gu Jiegang not only traced the origin of ancient historical legends but also further improved his research methods and approach in his investigation about ancient history.
机构地区 中国社会科学院历史理论研究所
出处 《南开学报:哲学社会科学版》 北大核心 2021年第2期120-129,共10页 Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
关键词 顾颉刚 “层累”说 “故事跨地域流布” 羌戎文化 Gu Jiegang "Accumulation Argument" "Cross-regional Distribution of Stories" Qiang Rong Culture
