摘要 为应对人民陪审员制度实践中普遍存在的形式主义缺陷,经过新一轮的制度改革试点,《人民陪审员法》正式确立在部分案件中将人民陪审员表决权限定在事实范围,即有限陪审权。如何界定事实范围是有限陪审权的核心。为有效发挥陪审员的实质民主作用,有必要结合诉讼中要件事实形成过程,以“生活事实—证据事实”、“证据事实—要件事实”两个事实进化阶段为视角,区分事实问题与法律问题,进而明确有限陪审权的事实范围,为后续的程序保障机制提供内容基础。 In response to the widespread defects in the practice of the People's jury system,after a new round of trial reform,the"People's Jury Law"formally established in some cases to limit the right to vote of people's jurors to the scope of facts,that is,limited jury power.How to define the scope of fact is the core of limited jury power.In order to effectively play the substantive democratic role of jurors,it is necessary to combine the formation process of the essential facts in the lawsuit,to distinguish between factual issues and legal issues from the perspective of the two factual evolution stages of"life facts—evidence facts"and"evidence facts—essential facts",then clear the limited jury power's fact scope,and ultimately provide the content foundation for the follow-up procedure safeguard mechanism.
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《乐山师范学院学报》 2021年第3期82-88,共7页 Journal of Leshan Normal University
基金 湘潭大学研究生科研创新项目“党政关系法治化研究”(XDCX2019B020)。
分类号 D926.2 [政治法律—法学]
