摘要 本文对769份刑事判决书中的违法性认识进行分析,发现现有判决的定罪量刑样态不一。具体而言,部分判决并未把违法性认识看作是犯罪的成立要件,部分判决将违法性认识看作是量刑情节之一,而另有部分判决则认为违法性认识的欠缺阻却犯罪故意的成立。在摒弃“不知法不免责”的观念与提倡“不知法不为罪”的理念下,应将违法性认识确认为犯罪的成立要件,并且是犯罪故意的组成部分。在具体个案中,基于责任主义原则,违法性认识判断基准的选取,应采取行为人的个体化标准而非一般人的社会化标准;在判断方法的建构上,则应采用是否存在促因、是否充分查询与是否进行假设因果流程的阶层审查式认定路径。 This paper analyzes the perception of illegality in 769 criminal judgments and finds that the existing judgments have different conviction and sentencing patterns.Specifically,some of the judgments do not consider the awareness of illegality as an element of crime,some of them consider the awareness of illegality as one of the sentencing circumstances,while some others consider the lack of awareness of illegality as a deterrent to the establishment of criminal intent.In abandoning the concept of"not knowing the law is not exempt"and advocating the concept of"not knowing the law is not a crime",the knowledge of illegality should be recognized as an element of the establishment of crime and a part of criminal intent.In specific cases,based on the principle of accountability,the benchmark for judging the knowledge of illegality should be the individualized standard of the actor rather than the socialized standard of the general public;and the construction of the judging method should adopt the hierarchical review path of whether there is a causation,whether there is sufficient inquiry and whether there is a hypothetical causal process.
机构地区 中国人民大学法学院
出处 《新疆社会科学》 2021年第1期99-108,170,共11页 Social Sciences in Xinjiang
基金 智能司法研究重庆市2011协同创新中心和重庆市人工智能+学科群之智慧司法学科建设资助项目“自动驾驶技术领域刑事归责的挑战及其应对研究”(ZNSF2020Y04)的阶段性成果。
