摘要 目的:考察假想和真实情境下高低特质焦虑个体对积极和消极事件的预测模式。方法:两个研究分别以205名和164名大学生为研究对象,均采用两因素实验设计,分别在实验室假想情景和真实事件(四六级考试)中,先填写状态-特质焦虑问卷(STAI)的特质焦虑分量表,然后对未来事件发生可能性、情绪强度进行预测和实际评估。结果:在假想情景中,高特质焦虑组预测积极事件发生可能性的评分低于低特质焦虑组[(1.8±1.2) vs.(3.1±0.9);P<0.01]。在真实情境下,低特质焦虑组实际未通过考试后的难过程度的评分高于预测评分[(6.2±2.2)vs.(4.4±2.1);P<0.01];高特质焦虑组实际通过考试后的开心程度的评分低于预测评分[(5.8±3.0)vs.(7.8±1.7);P<0.05]。结论:高低特质焦虑水平的个体对未来事件的情绪预测会受到事件本身情绪效价的影响,他们对情绪事件的预测模式存在差异。 Objective:To explore the prediction patterns of both high and low-quality anxiety individuals for positive and negative events in hypothetical situation and real situation.Methods:The two studies, with 205 and 164 college students, were designed with two factor experimental design which were designed to predict the probability and emotional intensity of future events after filling out the trait anxiety subscale, in the laboratory scenarios and real events(College English Test Band 4 and 6).Results:In the hypothetical situation, the scores of predicting the probability of a positive event were lower in the high-trait anxiety group than in the low-trait anxiety group [(1.8±1.2) vs.(3.1±0.9),P<0.01].In the real situation, the scores of sadness after actually failing the examination were higher than the scores of predicted sadness in the low-trait anxiety group [6.2±2.2) vs(4.4±2.1),P<0.01],the scores of happiness after actually passing the exam were lower than the scores of predicted happiness in the high-trait anxiety group [(5.8±3.0) vs.(7.8±1.7),P<0.05].Conclusion:Individuals with high and low trait anxiety levels’ emotional predictions of future events are influenced by the emotional effects of the events themselves, and their coping strategies for emotional events are also different.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第5期403-409,共7页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(14YJC190015)。
